13 members of Congress have written to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai criticizing his “repeated evasive responses to our inquiries” and “outright refusal to answer a few of the members of this Committee.” Unhappy with the solutions or evasions he has provided to this point, they reiterate questions associated to internet neutrality and different points that they’ve despatched over the previous months.
“Whereas we respect your continued willingness to testify earlier than our Committee, we’re involved that you’ve been unable to present full responses to verbal questions, questions for the file, or oversight letters from our members,” reads the letter from the Home Committee on Power and Commerce Democrats.
“We take our oversight duties very critically, and we anticipate witnesses earlier than the Committee and recipients of our letters to deal with their responses the identical method,” they wrote.
This group of Representatives, led by Frank Pallone Jr (D-NJ) and Mike Doyle (D-CO) have despatched a number of letters of inquiry to Pai over run-up to and aftermath of the net neutrality vote.
In June, they questioned the character of and response to the cyber assault on FCC programs through the internet neutrality remark interval. Pai responded saying that a lot of what they requested he could not answer as a result of the risk was “ongoing” and revealing the measures they took would “undermine” them.
Earlier than the passage of the principles, they warned that the FCC’s proposal “essentially and profoundly runs counter to the regulation,” and that they spoke with the authority of people that had helped craft that specific regulation. Pai’s response to this can be thought-about the rule itself, which he clearly believes is totally lawful and justifies itself in its prolonged preamble.
After the vote, they despatched a letter asking about numerous problems relating to the comment system and why, for instance, their very own feedback weren’t addressed. Pai responded to quite a lot of letters taking concern with the FCC’s Restoring Web Freedom order with a form letter of his own that assured his august pen buddies that every thing was high quality.
The insufficient responses to those and lots of different letters (on such points as media regulation and 911 points) clearly acquired the Committee to the purpose the place they felt they needed to strike again. A sternly worded letter could not do any extra now than it did during the last yr, however a paper path of displeasure and responses with a definite “lack of candor,” as Rep. Pallone put it, may very well be helpful down the street.
You can read the full letter here, to which is appended “a group of letters that you’ve but to reply utterly, or in any respect.” Chairman Pai is requested to supply responses by June 4.